Direct versus indirect revascularization procedures for. There are multiple adjuvant anticoagulation strategies available. Sts collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of. Comparative effectiveness study of drugeluting and bare.
Comparative costeffectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or. However, a 5year study comparing onpump versus offpump bypass surgery. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies article pdf available in indian heart journal 644. Abstractbackgroundascert american college of cardiology foundation and the society of thoracic surgeons collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies was a large observational study designed to compare the longterm effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft cabg and percutaneous coronary intervention pci to treat coronary artery disease cad. Download fulltext pdf comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies article pdf available in new england journal of medicine 36616. Final results from the accfsts database collaboration on the. Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention pci and coronary artery bypass grafting cabg for the treatment of patients with stable multivessel coronary artery disease is. As shown in the courage trial, optimal medical therapy is at least as good as pci in mortality reduction for patients with stable coronary artery disease. Treatment strategies for patients with peripheral artery disease schuyler jones, md and manesh patel, md july 22, 2015. Apr 19, 2012 the american college of cardiology foundation accf and the society of thoracic surgeons sts developed a partnership, the accf and sts database collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies ascert, to compare the outcomes of pci and cabg, using information from records in their respective databases, with.
In this 2009 report, the institute of medicines committee on comparative effectiveness research prioritization establishes a. The american college of cardiology foundation accf and the society of thoracic surgeons sts developed a partnership, the accf and sts database collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies ascert, to compare the outcomes of pci and cabg, using information from records in their respective databases. International study of comparative health effectiveness with. Cabg in 2 or 3 vessel diseasehuge retrospective study controlling for confounding at 1 yearno significant difference in acm rr 0. This study will be a model for comparative effectiveness using nonrandomized data, permitting extensive assessment of longterm clinical and economic outcomes after coronary revascularization from the largest clinical databases concerning revascularization in the world. Costeffectiveness of revascularization strategies jacc. Accf national cardiovascular data registry ncdr, we recently completed a comparison of the comparative.
Treatment strategies for patients with peripheral artery. Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention pci and coronary artery bypass grafting cabg for the treatment of patients with. The optimal surgical approach, however, remains unclear. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies nejm. We verified the performance of the propensity model by comparing the distribution of covariates and propensity scores between treatment groups both before and after inverse probability weighting. Read comparative effectiveness of endovascular or surgical revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia.
Costeffectiveness of revascularizationstrategies jacc. Douglas, mdf abstract the evaluation of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease is among the most common diagnostic. Read comparative effectiveness analysis of anticoagulant strategies in a large observational database of percutaneous coronary interventions, journal of interventional cardiology on deepdyve, the largest online rental service for scholarly research with thousands of academic publications available at your fingertips. Comparative effectiveness of treatment strategies for.
Challenges and importance of finding hidden confounders. Pdf comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. There are no prospective randomized trial data to guide decisions on optimal revascularization strategies for patients with multivessel coronary artery. The american college of cardiology foundation accf and the society of thoracic surgeons sts collaborated to compare the rates of longterm survival after pci and cabg. The strategies of percutaneous coronary intervention pci and coronaryartery bypass grafting cabg for revascularization have been compared in randomized clinical trials. In this scenario, expectations for additional surgical. Effective, adaptive learning that helps you prepare for certification, maintain competency, and sharpen clinical decisionmaking while earning cme and moc. Ascert american college of cardiology foundation and the society of thoracic surgeons collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies was a large observational study designed to compare the longterm effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft cabg and percutaneous coronary intervention pci to treat coronary artery disease cad over 4 to 5 years. In this decision analysis, the authors compared the effectiveness of revascularization procedures in both adult and pediatric patients with mmd.
The outcomes were examined across initial revascularization strategies, including bms, des, and cabg. Hybrid coronary revascularization hcr combines surgical bypass with percutaneous. For comparative effectiveness recommendations class i and iia. Most strategies were not different between men and women. Background ascert american college of cardiology foundation and the society of thoracic surgeons collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies was a large observational study designed to compare the longterm effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft cabg and percutaneous coronary intervention pci to treat coronary artery disease cad over 4 to 5. This study examined the costeffectiveness of cabg versus pci for stable ischemic heart disease. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness researchcer is designed to fill this knowledge gap by assisting patients and healthcare providers across diverse settings in making more informed decisions. Longterm survival prediction for coronary artery bypass grafting. Comparative effectiveness of management strategies for renal artery stenosis. In this era of cost containment, we performed a comparative effectiveness analysis of clinical outcomes and cost of the major anticoagulant strategies across all types of pci procedures in a large. Furthermore, the significant increase in revascularization associated with mps, ccta, and ee without a concomitant reduction in mi suggests that overdiagnosis is a legitimate concern in this patient population. Original article from the new england journal of medicine comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. Over the past decade, there has been an evolution in imaging research with an everincreasing focus on larger registries and randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of.
The search included comparative and noncomparative prospective studies that enrolled patients. Database collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies ascert, to compare the outcomes of pci and cabg, using information from records in their respective databases, with followup data from claims records of the centers for medicare and medicaid services cms. Angiographic validation of the american college of. Arterial revascularization strategies between the sexes in the pmcs are presented in table 2. Comparative effectiveness and the united states healthcare system. Costeffectiveness of revascularization strategies the ascert. Revascularization strategies and outcomes in elderly patients. Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus surgical revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia. Jun 01, 2012 read comparative effectiveness analysis of anticoagulant strategies in a large observational database of percutaneous coronary interventions, journal of interventional cardiology on deepdyve, the largest online rental service for scholarly research with thousands of academic publications available at your fingertips. Accfaha pocket guideline management of patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization november 2011 adapted from the 2011 accfahascai guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2011 accfaha guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery developed in collaboration with the american association for thoracic. The american college of cardiology foundation accf, the society of thoracic surgeons sts, and the duke clinical research institute are collaborating on a comparative effectiveness study american college of cardiology foundationsociety of thoracic surgeons collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies. Coronary artery disease cad is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Scientific advancements has not only resulted in better revascularization strategies over the time but has also contributed significantly to the medical management of coronary artery disease.
Request pdf comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies in stable ischemic heart disease. Without the dmf, comparative effectiveness or surveillance studies will be delayed, more costly, and, in many instances, infeasible. Cost effectiveness of revascularization strategies. Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus surgical. Surgical intervention is the definitive treatment, with direct, indirect, and combined revascularization procedures currently employed by surgeons.
Composite outcomes in coronary bypass surgery versus. Comparative effectiveness of coronary artery bypass. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies article pdf available in new england journal of medicine 36616. Pdf hybrid coronary revascularization hcr involves the integration of coronary artery. Target limb revascularization, target lesion revascularization, acute limb ischemia. The american college of cardiology foundation accf and the society of thoracic surgeons sts developed a partnership, the accf and sts database collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies ascert, to compare the outcomes of pci and cabg, using information from records in their respective databases, with.
Accfaha pocket guideline management of patients undergoing. Why we still need randomized trials to compare effectiveness laura mauri, m. Questions persist concerning the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention pci and coronaryartery bypass grafting. Nov 01, 2016 renal artery stenosis management strategies. In this analysis, we describe the comparative effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting cabg versus percutaneous coronary intervention pci in this patient population. In this era of cost containment, we performed a comparative effectiveness analysis of clinical outcomes and cost of the major anticoagulant strategies across all types of pci procedures in a large observational database. Background ascert american college of cardiology foundation and the society of thoracic surgeons collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies was a large observational study designed to compare the longterm effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft cabg and percutaneous coronary intervention pci to treat coronary artery disease cad over. Clinical events reported occurred after initial revascularization therapy. Jan 01, 2010 this study will be a model for comparative effectiveness using nonrandomized data, permitting extensive assessment of longterm clinical and economic outcomes after coronary revascularization from the largest clinical databases concerning revascularization in the world. Title presented as comparative effectiveness of treatments for women with coronary artery disease title revised to comparative effectiveness of treatment strategies for women with coronary artery disease the revised title clarifies the reports focus on comparison of treatment strategies for this population. Costeffectiveness of revascularization strategies the. The ascert study the national heart, lung, and blood institute of the national institutes of health nih has awarded a grant to the american college of cardiology acc in partnership with the society of thoracic surgeons sts to study the comparative effectiveness of the two forms of coronary revascularization. Padrelated cost effectiveness analysis of the zilver ptx stent relative to other revascularization strategies is also warranted in the future. Dec 20, 2016 comparative effectiveness of management strategies for renal artery stenosis.
Accfaha pocket guideline management of patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization. The comparative effectiveness of hybrid revascularization midcab then pci with des versus multivessel des pci or cabg hrevs the safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Revascularization strategy ascert longterm sur vival probability calculator is a valuable. Ascert researchers compare survival rates of two revascularization strategies posted on march 27, 2012 november 10, 2016 by ronel march 27, 2012 sean obrien, phd, and other dcri researchers provided data analysis for this largescale comparative effectiveness study. Treatment strategies for patients with peripheral artery disease. Revascularization strategies for patients with stable. Boden importance of comparative effectiveness strategy. Importance of comparative effectiveness strategy trials in clinical decisionmaking the courage to aim high william e. Why we still need randomized trials to compare effectiveness. Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies 10. Comparative effectiveness analysis of anticoagulant. Background hybrid coronary revascularization hcr involves the. In various clinical trials comparing the two revascularization strategies, mortality advantage for cabg has been found in some studies for patients with diabetes and complex coronary artery disease. The evaluation of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease is among the most common diagnostic evaluations with nearly 20 million imaging and exercise stress tests performed annually in the united states.
Final results from the accfsts database collaboration on. Pdf comparative effectiveness of revascularization. Questions persist concerning the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention pci and coronaryartery bypass grafting cabg. Comparative effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies. Angiographic validation of the american college of cardiology. A metaanalysis, journal of the american college of cardiology on deepdyve, the largest online rental service for scholarly research with thousands of academic publications available at your fingertips. Over the past 20 years, there have been 12 randomized trials in which the revascularization strategies of coronaryartery bypass grafting cabg and percutaneous coronary intervention pci have been compared, against the back. International study of comparative health effectiveness. Comparative effectiveness of management strategies for renal. A cost effectiveness analysis of the zilver ptx stent compared to bms use should be performed. Comparative effectiveness of treatment strategies for women. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of allcause mortality, myocardial infarction, or revascularization through latest followup.
Comparative effectiveness of management strategies for. Presented at the twentyseventh annual meeting of the eastern vascular society, white sulpher springs, wva, september 1922, 20. Challenges and importance of finding hidden confounders when. The american college of cardiology foundation accf and the society of thoracic surgeons sts developed a partnership, the accf and sts database collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies ascert, to compare the outcomes of pci and cabg, using information from records in their respective databases, with followup data from claims records of the centers for medicare and medicaid services cms. Comparative effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting.
Mar 27, 2012 ascert researchers compare survival rates of two revascularization strategies posted on march 27, 2012 november 10, 2016 by ronel march 27, 2012 sean obrien, phd, and other dcri researchers provided data analysis for this largescale comparative effectiveness study. Prepared by the brown evidencebased practice center under contract no. Comparative effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies in. Despite intensive appraisal, there remain questions regarding the comparative effectiveness of the 2 forms of coronary revascularization therapy. Although the therapeutic strategies for patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular function have achieved similar outcomes in short and longterm followup, clinical events attributed to these different therapeutic forms are not considered comparatively under the parameters of costs and effectiveness 1, 2. Ascert american college of cardiology foundation and the society of thoracic surgeons collaboration on the comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies was a large observational study designed to compare the longterm effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft cabg and percutaneous coronary intervention pci to treat coronary artery disease cad over 4 to. Impact of gender on arterial revascularization strategies for. Boden, md, facc, faha professor of medicine, albany medical college chief of medicine, stratton va medical center vicechairman, department of. Revascularization strategies and outcomes in elderly. Similarly, differences in gender revascularization strategies. Jan 18, 2017 clinical events reported occurred after initial revascularization therapy. Weiss comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies n.
Comparative effectiveness of endovascular and surgical. Comparative effectiveness trials of imagingguided strategies in stable ischemic heart disease leslee j. Established role for carotid revascularization nascet. Comparative effectiveness and the united states healthcare. Impact of gender on arterial revascularization strategies.
306 1462 401 813 26 155 771 1437 1479 287 187 504 981 820 1253 642 1063 615 627 1227 478 124 459 498 1282 960 180 493 483 132 44